Ethereum's PeerDAS vs. Solana Scaling: Which Wins the Speed Game in 2025?

For years, Solana has been the DeFi’s Ferrari: fast, sleek, and designed for blistering throughput.

Ethereum, meanwhile, has played the role of the secure yet slow semi-truck: low throughput, high fees, but trusted to haul the world’s largest DeFi and institutional value.

But all of that changes on December 3, 2025, when Ethereum launches PeerDAS, a data-availability breakthrough inside the Fusaka upgrade that promises:

  • 8× more data capacity

  • Sub-$1 swaps on Layer 2 rollups

  • 100,000+ TPS potential through L2 scaling

Is Ethereum finally catching up to Solana or is Solana still too fast to beat?

As of November 2025:

  • Solana processes 78M+ daily transactions, with fees under a penny.

  • Ethereum L1 processes ~1.5M, while L2s push that to ~10M.

  • Post-PeerDAS, ETH aims for 50M+ daily and 12,000–100,000 TPS via rollups.

It’s a battle for the future of DeFi, NFTs, gaming, real-world assets (RWAs), and enterprise blockchain adoption.


Core Architectures: Modular Ethereum vs. Monolithic Solana

Comparing Solana and Ethereum is like comparing a racecar to a fleet of self-driving electric vans.

Solana: The Monolithic Speed Machine

Solana bundles execution, settlement, and data availability into a single L1 engine.

  • Proof-of-History + Tower BFT

  • ~400ms block times

  • Theoretical 65,000 TPS

  • Real-world 950–4,700 TPS after the 2025 compute limit upgrade

  • Finality in ~12.8s

This “everything on L1” design makes Solana fast, but creates single-state pressure, which has led to congestion and outages.

Ethereum: Modular, Secure, L2-Powered

Ethereum keeps L1 extremely secure and offloads execution to Layer 2 rollups.

PeerDAS changes everything:

  • Nodes only sample 1–2% of data (instead of 100%)

  • Bandwidth reduced ~80%

  • Blobs increased from 6 → 48 per block

  • L1 capacity rises to ~40–60 TPS

  • L2 TPS jumps to 10,000+, with a roadmap toward 100,000+ TPS

PeerDAS makes Ethereum’s modular design feel fast without compromising decentralization.

Winner (Architecture):

Solana for raw speed today. Ethereum for long-term scalability and security.


TPS & Throughput: Solana’s Sprint vs. Ethereum’s Marathon

Real-World TPS Comparison (ETH vs SOL Nov 2025)

Metric Solana Ethereum (Pre-Fusaka) Ethereum (PeerDAS/Fusaka)
Real TPS 950–4,700 L1: 15–20; L2s 100–500 L1: 40–60; L2s 10,000+
Theoretical TPS 65,000 30 (L1 only) 100,000+ via L2s
Block Time 0.4s 12s 12s
Daily Transactions 78M+ L1: 1.5M / L2s 10M+ ~50M+ projected

Solana TPS Strengths

  • Handles memecoin and perps mania (1,800 TPS during 2025 frenzy)

  • Processes 60% of perp DEX volume

  • Lightning-fast UX

Weakness: Spam attacks can cause 2–4 hour outages, five between 2024–2025.

Ethereum TPS Strengths

  • PeerDAS enables 12,000 TPS by 2026 (comparable to Visa)

  • Zero downtime since 2015

  • Prioritizes safety over hype

Winner (TPS):

Solana in 2025; Ethereum by 2026 if scaling plays out.


Fees & Costs: Pennies vs. Predictable Scaling

Solana Fees (2025)

  • Sub-$0.01 average

  • Perfect for gaming, social apps, microtransactions

  • $9B DeFi TVL

Ethereum Fees

  • L1: $2–$5 during peaks

  • L2s: $0.05–$0.20 post-Pectra

  • PeerDAS: 50–70% cheaper L2 blobs → sub-penny swaps

Example: Uniswap on Base drops from ~$1 → $0.10

Winner (Fees):

Tie. Solana is cheaper today, Ethereum catches up with PeerDAS.


Decentralization & Reliability: The Security Showdown

Ethereum: The Security King

  • 1,000+ Nakamoto coefficient

  • 1T+ secured on-chain

  • Can run a node on Raspberry Pi post-PeerDAS

  • 10+ years without outages

  • Rollup diversity reduces systemic risk

Solana: Incredible Speed, Lower Redundancy

  • ~844–903 validators

  • Nakamoto coefficient: ~20

  • Stake-weighted QoS favors large validators

  • Multiple outages (4+ hour halt in 2024)

Winner (Security & Reliability):

Ethereum by a wide margin.


Ecosystems: Who’s Building the Future?

Ethereum

  • $500B+ DeFi TVL

  • $10B NFT market

  • 80% of stablecoins run on ETH rails

  • Institutional dominance: ETH ETFs, staked ETH, RWAs

  • Fusaka + PeerDAS could anchor $1T+ on-chain assets by 2026

Solana

  • 2.3M+ daily active users

  • Strong meme coin, gaming, and social presence

  • 78% developer growth

  • ETFs from Fidelity & BlackRock

  • $9B TVL

  • The “consumer chain” of crypto

Winner (Ecosystem):

Ethereum for depth; Solana for UX and growth.


Future Outlook: Who Wins in 2026?

Ethereum’s Path

  • PeerDAS + Danksharding → 100,000 TPS

  • No outages

  • Highest security

  • Enterprise adoption momentum

Solana’s Path

  • Firedancer (Q2 2026) → 1M+ TPS

  • Alpenglow: 150ms finality

  • Still working on decentralization and reliability

  • Prime hub for perps, gaming, memes, and high-frequency apps

Analyst Consensus

  • ETH ≈ $10,000 roadmap

  • SOL ≈ $1,000–$2,000 roadmap

  • Multi-chain world: ETH = security base layer, SOL = high-speed user layer


Final Verdict

Category Solana Ethereum (PeerDAS / Fusaka)
Position in 2025 Fastest major chain today, delivering 950–4,700 real TPS and sub-penny fees with 78M+ daily transactions. PeerDAS launches Dec 3, 2025, increasing data capacity 8× and enabling 10,000+ TPS on L2s, positioning ETH to scale without sacrificing decentralization.
Architecture Monolithic: execution, settlement, and data on one ultra-fast L1. Pros: speed and smooth UX. Cons: outages + lower decentralization. Modular: L1 for security/settlement, L2s for speed. PeerDAS adds cheap blobs, sampling, and massive throughput growth.
Performance Handles 1,800 TPS during peak memecoin mania, 60% of perp DEX volume. Targeting 1M+ TPS with Firedancer in 2026. L1 boosts to 40–60 TPS; L2s push toward 100,000+ TPS by 2026 (Visa-scale).
Fees Always <$0.01. Ideal for consumer apps (games, social, micro-payments). L2 fees drop 50–70% under PeerDAS, aiming for sub-penny swaps on Base, Arbitrum, Optimism.
Decentralization & Reliability ~900 validators; Nakamoto coefficient ~20. Key weakness: 2–4 hour outages (five since 2024). 1,000+ Nakamoto coefficient, no outages since 2015. PeerDAS reduces node hardware needs—enhancing decentralization.
Ecosystem Strength 2.3M daily active users, booming memecoins + gaming + social. ETFs by BlackRock/Fidelity; $9B DeFi TVL. Dominates DeFi ($500B+ TVL), institutions, and stablecoins (80% on ETH). Targeting $1T+ on-chain assets by 2026.
2026 Outlook Firedancer brings 1M+ TPS and faster finality (150ms). Still needs better decentralization. PeerDAS + Danksharding achieve scalable L2 performance with high security. ETH becomes the global settlement layer.
Overall Summary Solana wins today on UX and raw L1 speed—fast, cheap, and ideal for daily apps. Ethereum wins long-term on decentralization, reliability, and infinite modular scaling.

PeerDAS finally makes Ethereum fast, while Solana continues to dominate the UX race. Both chains will likely win because they serve different purposes in a multi-chain future.

Previous
Previous

5 New Crypto Spot ETFs Launching in the Next 6 Days

Next
Next

PeerDAS Explained: How Ethereum Will Make Crypto Fees Drop 50–70% in December 2025